![]() |
|
| HOME | ART | FORUM | ARCADE | LIBRARY | NETWORK | ||
Scifi and Fantasy Forum: Movies: The Village
The VillageWe have moved to new forum software and posting here is closed!
I'm beginning to think M. Night Shyamalan is incapable of making bad movies. This movie is every bit as good as his others, and it twists like no other. While I enjoyed Signs more, this movie has made it into my collection quicker than any other movie but Fellowship of the Ring.
Gnollsayer, I'm with your parents. I liked Signs alot, and the Bruce Willis one was very good as well (despite the fact I don't think much of Bruce Willis), but this one left me cold. We watched it twice just to be sure we really disliked it as much as we did, because the first time we watched it, we figured we must have missed something. But even after watching it a second time, it didn't appeal to us at all.
Unbreakable is my least favorite of Shyamalan's films. It's good, don't get me wrong, but not on the same level as the other ones.
The village?
Sorry for the editing, but it's my job as a moderator. Bleaping letters out of swears is not allowed.
I liked "The Village." It was billed as horror, but it isn't, exactly (and that has more to do with the limitations of the movie genre classification system than anything else, I think). More a look into the human psyche, which tends to be more unsettling than anything else. There were clues all the way through the movie (Shyamalan does this -- and when you glom onto what's going on it's a smack-yourself-in-the forehead moment) that the little community wasn't what it seemed to be, beyond the secrets and the strange creatures said to inhabit the woods. You have to look behind the actors to catch the clues, though, for instance at the buildings and the way they're constructed.
I think that most classification systems are limited and so other movies/stories/authors are inappropriately typecast.
i was initially very disappointed, i had gone to see a horror movie, and gotten something completely different. However brilliant cinematography. a somewhat guessable storyline, nothing about it really surprised me- the costumes were completely wrong, though i think that was intentional. However, re watching it, it was worth the money i paid- interesting concept and good for pondering ^^ Actually, cinema-geek i am, i'd buy it simply for the cinematography ^^
I think it was Manji who said that the concept of the movie was better then the movie itself. That seems to be the opinion of everyone I talk to about it, and I must agree. But it was enjoyable all the same.
The cinematography is awesome! I still love this movie, and still love the beautiful shots every time I watch it. I must say though, that I liked Signs better than this.
Yeah. My ranking of M. Knight Shayamalan's movies thus far is as follows.
I would ranks "Signs" as the best, "The Sixth Sense" as second, "The Village" third, and "Unbreakable" fourth. I like them all, though, so it's easy to see how they could fall in any order.
I believe that The Sixth Sense had more themactic merits to it, and the ending was quite the shocker. But I personally enjoyed Signs better. But Unbreakable is one of my all time favorite movies, awesome all the way through.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Speculative Vision Science Fiction and Fantasy © 1996 - 2001 Brad Richardson. All rights reserved. privacy policy |