We have moved to new forum software and posting here is closed!

PLEASE BOOKMARK THE NEW FORUMS

Posted By: Neurolanis Jan 01, 2005 - 06:27 pm

Ok, I have a really, really short attention span. I can't stand tv or movies even. That bad. This one i watched twice, and both times did other things because it just could't earn my full attention. Therefore, I can't really give it a full review. But I'd just like to say that despite its partial lack of story, it is visually one of the best films I've ever seen. Like great paintings or something -- amazing usage of colour and light! Very good. Visually.

Posted By: woody000 Jan 02, 2005 - 03:33 am

Hmm... interesting. I think a lot of it was taste. For instance, I think it was probably pretty realistic, but I'm personally not a great fan of realistic, so I found some of the photography to be a bit on the dull side.

To each his own I guess.

I thought the cinematography was generally good though.

Posted By: Magus Jan 02, 2005 - 10:46 am

I haven't seen it yet. I've been rather behind in my movie watching since my sister's been at college. I'm sure we'll watch something in theater's before she leaves next week, though.

Posted By: Kevin Jan 02, 2005 - 11:43 am

Yes, I hope that this movie is nominated for Best Cinematography, it is truly amazing.