![]() |
|
| HOME | ART | FORUM | ARCADE | LIBRARY | NETWORK | ||
Scifi and Fantasy Forum: Movies: Movies they NEED to make
Movies they NEED to makeWe have moved to new forum software and posting here is closed!
I thought that was a joke. Mel Brooks never makes sequels. He ridicules them, and always points out that they're all made simply for the money.
http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire/art-main.html?2004-09/28/11.00.film
OH! I just remembered something. It's in a book by Robert Ebert. It's a section entitled "The Best Porn Movie Titles Based off Legit Movies.". I'll post them all when I can get home and to the book. But there's one I do remember:
They need to make a series of films based on David Eddings 'The Belgariad'and then a sequal series based on 'The Malloreon'... that would be really good!
I thought it was Shaving Ryan's Privates...
Just read the interview *Shakes head* How could Mel Brooks succumb to such greed. Tsk tsk tsk.
Moichendising! Moichendising! Where thr real money is made!
I agree with chipshop. They would be the greatest films ever made!
The Thief of Always should be a movie. If you haven't read that book, go do so NOW.
All of the Dark Tower series should be made into movies. I'm not sure how they would measure up. Stephen King has a bad track record for adaptations based on his works. And this is one of his most complex works ever written, acting as a focal point of nearly all of his other works. If they could pull it off then it would be a masterpiece. If they cannot then it would be better left alone then poorly adapted.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Speculative Vision Science Fiction and Fantasy © 1996 - 2001 Brad Richardson. All rights reserved. privacy policy |